---

name: prompt-pack-arbitration-cost-submission
description: Use when drafting a costs submission in an international arbitration proceeding seeking recovery of a party's legal fees, expert fees, arbitration institution costs, and other recoverable expenses. Arbitration practice area; covers DIAC, ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and CRCICA cost recovery principles with MENA-specific notes on cost allocation practices and tribunal discretion.
license: MIT
metadata:
id: prompt-pack.arbitration-cost-submission
category: prompt-pack
practice_area: arbitration
priority: P2
intent: [drafting, arbitration-cost-submission]
related: [prompt-pack-arbitration-agreement-clause, prompt-pack-arbitration-clause-comparison, prompt-pack-award-enforcement-application, heuristic-always-state-jurisdiction-first, kb-arbitration-mena]
source: Louis — HAQQ Legal AI (github.com/sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal)
version: "1.0"

Arbitration Cost Submission

When to use this

Use this skill when counsel needs to prepare a costs submission at the conclusion of an arbitration proceeding, seeking the tribunal's order that costs (legal fees, expert fees, arbitration costs) be borne by the opposing party.

Costs submissions typically arise:

• At the end of the hearing phase when the tribunal requests cost submissions
• After a separate procedural order or award has been issued
• In response to the opposing party's cost claim
• When a partial award on jurisdiction or liability invites cost submissions

The quality of a costs submission directly affects how much the tribunal orders in cost recovery — a well-structured, documented submission with clear cost recovery principles consistently wins more than a vague list of fees.

---

Prompt template

Draft a costs submission for [Party] in [Arbitration Case Reference] seeking recovery of legal costs and expenses. Include detailed breakdown of legal fees, expert fees, arbitration costs, and other expenses with supporting documentation and applicable cost principles.

Use [[conversation-clarifying-questions]] to elicit [bracketed] inputs before drafting.

---

Required inputs

Input	Why it matters
Party name and role (Claimant/Respondent)	The submission is party-specific
Arbitration case reference	Identifies the proceeding
Applicable institutional rules	Cost recovery principles differ by institution
Total costs claimed (with breakdown)	Core substantive content
Outcome of the arbitration	Cost recovery arguments are anchored to success/failure
Tribunal's procedural order on costs (if any)	Some tribunals issue specific guidance on the costs submission format

---

Document structure

1. Introduction

• Case reference and parties
• Brief statement of the outcome (Claimant/Respondent prevailed on all/most/some claims)
• Summary of total costs claimed
• Relief sought: "The Claimant respectfully requests that the Tribunal order the Respondent to bear the Claimant's costs of the arbitration in the amount of USD [X]."

2. Applicable legal principles on costs

Each institution's rules address cost recovery differently. Summarize the applicable rule and the tribunal's discretion:

Institution	Cost rule
ICC (2021 Rules Art. 38)	Tribunal shall fix costs; may allocate between parties as appropriate; considers outcome and other relevant circumstances
LCIA (2020 Rules Art. 28)	"Costs follow the event" as the starting point, unless the tribunal considers it inappropriate; recovery of reasonable legal costs
SIAC (2016 Rules Rule 35)	Tribunal has full discretion; considers the outcome and all relevant circumstances
DIAC (2022 Rules Art. 41)	Tribunal determines and allocates costs; considers all relevant circumstances
CRCICA (2011 Rules Art. 40)	Tribunal fixes and allocates costs in the award; considers outcome
UNCITRAL (2013 Rules Art. 42)	Tribunal fixes and allocates costs; "costs follow the event" principle referenced

General principle (applicable across all institutions): a party that substantially prevails on the merits is ordinarily entitled to recover its reasonable costs, subject to the tribunal's discretion. Key arguments for full cost recovery:

• The Respondent's conduct made the arbitration necessary and/or prolonged it
• The Claimant succeeded on the main claim
• The costs claimed are proportionate to the amount in dispute and the complexity of the issues
• The costs were reasonably incurred

Arguments for partial recovery (to pre-empt if full recovery is sought):

• Success was partial — seek full recovery on issues won; accept reduced recovery on issues lost
• Proportionality: costs are proportionate to claims upheld

3. Cost schedule — legal fees

Present as a table:

Timekeeper	Role	Hours	Rate (USD/hr)	Amount
[Lead counsel]	Partner	XX	USD X,XXX	USD XX,XXX
[Associate 1]	Senior associate	XX	USD XXX	USD XX,XXX
[Associate 2]	Associate	XX	USD XXX	USD XX,XXX
Total legal fees				USD XXX,XXX

Supporting documentation: attach time records (redacted for privilege where necessary but sufficiently detailed to show the work done and its connection to the arbitration).

Reasonableness arguments:

• Rates are consistent with the market for counsel of this experience level in this seat
• Hours are appropriate for the complexity and size of this dispute
• Each phase of work was necessary (reference major procedural steps: pleadings, document production, witness statements, expert reports, hearing preparation, post-hearing briefs)

4. Cost schedule — expert fees

Expert	Expertise	Work done	Amount
[Expert 1]	Quantum/damages	Report + hearing attendance	USD XX,XXX
[Expert 2]	Technical	Report + concurrent evidence session	USD XX,XXX
Total expert fees			USD XX,XXX

Supporting documentation: invoices; expert fee agreements; explanation of why each expert was necessary.

5. Cost schedule — arbitration institutional costs

Item	Amount
Filing fee	USD X,XXX
Administrative fee	USD XX,XXX
Arbitrators' fees (paid portion)	USD XX,XXX
Total institutional costs	USD XX,XXX

Note: the final arbitrators' fees are typically set by the institution or tribunal after the award. This submission covers the costs already paid, with a note that the full arbitrators' fee will be known only at the time of the final award.

6. Cost schedule — other recoverable expenses

Item	Amount
Hearing room rental	USD X,XXX
Transcript	USD X,XXX
Travel and accommodation (hearing attendance)	USD X,XXX
Document production / e-discovery costs	USD X,XXX
Translation costs	USD X,XXX
Total other expenses	USD X,XXX

7. Total costs claimed

Category	Amount
Legal fees	USD XXX,XXX
Expert fees	USD XX,XXX
Institutional costs	USD XX,XXX
Other expenses	USD XX,XXX
TOTAL	USD XXX,XXX

8. Conduct and efficiency arguments

This section strengthens the case for full recovery by showing the other party's conduct:

• Respondent's conduct that unnecessarily prolonged proceedings (late filings, excessive document requests, unfounded jurisdictional objections)
• Claimant's conduct that was efficient and proportionate
• Any unreasonable offers to settle that were rejected by Respondent (can support argument for full indemnity costs)

9. Relief sought

For the foregoing reasons, [Party] respectfully requests that the Tribunal:

1. Order [Opposing Party] to pay [Party's] costs of the arbitration in the amount of USD [X], representing [Party's] legal fees, expert fees, institutional costs, and other expenses as set out above;
2. Order that interest at the rate of [X%] per annum shall accrue on such costs from the date of the award until payment; and
3. Grant such further or other relief as the Tribunal considers just.

---

Jurisdictional and institutional notes

DIAC / UAE

UAE arbitral tribunals have historically been somewhat restrained in cost awards compared to LCIA tribunals. A well-documented submission significantly improves recovery. Arbitrators' fees in Dubai are often higher per day than in London or Singapore but the total is usually lower due to shorter hearings.

LCIA

LCIA tribunals apply "costs follow the event" most consistently. A party that wins on the merits can reasonably expect to recover 60–75% of reasonable legal costs. Document the rates paid by reference to the LCIA's own cost guidance notes.

ICC

ICC tribunals have wide discretion. The ICC's administrative fee structure is relatively high; claiming recovery of the full ICC administrative fee is appropriate if the Claimant prevailed.

KSA / SCCA

Saudi arbitral tribunals tend to order each party to bear its own costs, particularly in disputes involving Saudi government entities. Argue cost recovery on specific grounds (bad faith, clearly unmeritorious defences) rather than relying solely on "costs follow the event."

---

Common mistakes

• Submitting costs without a time record — tribunals routinely deny unsubstantiated cost claims
• No proportionality argument — a USD 2M cost claim in a USD 5M dispute without proportionality argument will be reduced
• Failing to recover institutional costs actually paid — these are straightforwardly recoverable if the party prevailed
• No interest claim on costs — most institutional rules permit this; it is routinely ordered

---

Related skills

• [[prompt-pack-arbitration-agreement-clause]] — the clause that governs costs recovery
• [[prompt-pack-arbitration-clause-comparison]] — institutional rules comparison including cost provisions
• [[prompt-pack-award-enforcement-application]] — enforcing the costs award
• [[kb-arbitration-mena]] — MENA arbitration law and practice reference