import-politique-lanceur-alerte-fr

Category: Coding Risk: Medium risk ★ 3.9 · Rating 3.9/5 (8) sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal MIT

Rating is derived from the repo's GitHub stars and shown for reference.

filesystem_accessautomation_control

name: import-politique-lanceur-alerte-fr
description: Use when migrating a French whistleblower policy (politique lanceur d'alerte) drafting or review skill into the mini-claude-for-legal format. The adapter maps French Sapin II and Waserman Law compliance logic — mandatory alert channels, protected-person scope, investigation procedures, and anti-retaliation obligations — into the standard skill model. Primary jurisdiction France; also relevant for EU Whistleblower Directive transposition in other member states and Lebanese corporate-governance best practice.
license: MIT
metadata:
id: import.politique-lanceur-alerte-FR
category: import
jurisdictions: [FR, EU, LB]
priority: P3
intent: [import, lanceur-alerte, whistleblower, sapin-ii, france, migration]
related: [import-politique-confidentialite-fr, import-politique-cookies-fr, import-gdpr-privacy-notice-eu, kb-employment-law-fr]
source: Louis — HAQQ Legal AI (github.com/sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal)
version: "1.0"

Import: Politique Lanceur d'Alerte (France)

What it does

This import adapter migrates a French whistleblower policy (politique lanceur d'alerte) skill into the mini-claude-for-legal standard format. French whistleblower law is among the most developed in Europe: the Sapin II Law (Loi n° 2016-1691 du 9 décembre 2016) and the subsequent Waserman Law (Loi n° 2022-401 du 21 mars 2022, transposing the EU Whistleblower Directive) impose mandatory obligations on companies with 50 or more employees to establish a secure, confidential internal alert channel.

Non-compliance can result in criminal liability for the responsible officer and reputational damage. Critically, any whistleblower who faces retaliation has specific protected-person status and can obtain reinstatement, damages, and criminal sanctions against the retaliating employer.

Import config

Field Source mapping Default if absent
policy_type Legacy type politique_lanceur_alerte
entity_size Legacy employees 50+ (triggers mandatory obligation)
channel_type Legacy channel internal_and_external
referent_alerte Legacy referent Required — prompt user if absent
investigation_procedure Legacy procedure boolean true
anti_retaliation_clause Legacy anti_retaliation boolean true
confidentiality_guarantee Legacy confidentiality boolean true
language Legacy lang fr
output_format Legacy format full_policy_fr

Dry-run preview

IMPORT PREVIEW — politique-lanceur-alerte-FR
Source shape         : French whistleblower policy template
Entity size          : 50+ employees (mandatory channel required)
Channel              : internal + external (Waserman Law)
Référent alerte      : [requires user input]
Investigation        : mandatory procedure enabled
Anti-retaliation     : enabled
Confidentiality      : enabled
Language             : French
Output               : full_policy_fr

Legal framework (post-import context)

Sapin II Law (2016)

  • Applies to entities with 50+ employees (public and private)
  • Required: internal alert channel, confidential procedure, referent désigné
  • Whistleblower definition: person who discloses, in good faith, a crime, misdemeanour, threat to general interest, violation of law or regulation, or international commitment

Waserman Law (2022) — EU Directive transposition

Key expansions over Sapin II:

  • Extended protection: protects not only the whistleblower but also facilitators, colleagues, and relatives who may suffer retaliation
  • External channel mandatory: must inform employees of both internal and external channels (Défenseur des Droits, sectoral authorities)
  • Confidentiality reinforced: identity of the whistleblower must be kept strictly confidential throughout; violation is a criminal offence
  • Broader scope: now includes violations of EU law in addition to French law
  • Dedicated referent: companies must designate a referent with specific training and independence guarantees

Mandatory policy content

1. Scope and purpose

  • Who can use the alert channel (employees, suppliers, subcontractors, shareholders)
  • What can be reported (violations of law, ethical breaches, threats to general interest)

2. Alert channels

  • Internal: dedicated secure email, secure web form, or physical address; must be separate from normal HR channels
  • External: reference to external channels (Défenseur des Droits, AFA for anti-corruption, financial regulator, etc.)
  • Protection of anonymity: option for anonymous reporting must be offered; policy must explain how anonymity is preserved

3. Investigation procedure

  • Acknowledgement of receipt within 7 days
  • Investigation timeline: outcome communicated to alertant within 3 months (or extended with justification)
  • Who conducts the investigation: referent alerte (first instance); escalation path to audit committee or external body
  • Separation of investigation from persons implicated

4. Confidentiality guarantees

  • Identity of the alertant is confidential — cannot be disclosed without consent except when legally required
  • Identity of the implicated person is confidential pending investigation
  • Information gathered during investigation is confidential

5. Anti-retaliation protections

  • Prohibition on all forms of retaliation: dismissal, demotion, harassment, exclusion
  • Reinstatement right: courts can order reinstatement with back pay
  • Shift of burden: employer must demonstrate any adverse action was unrelated to the alert
  • Criminal penalties: 1 year imprisonment + €15,000 fine for obstruction of alert procedure (Sapin II Art 13)

6. Data protection compliance

  • Alert system processes personal data → GDPR Article 13/14 notice required → reference to GDPR rights
  • Retention: limited; CNIL recommends deletion of alert data that does not lead to investigation within 2 months
  • Impact assessment (DPIA) recommended for alert processing systems

Common import issues

Issue Resolution
No référent designated Flag HIGH risk; mandatory under Waserman Law
Anonymous reporting not offered Flag MEDIUM risk; Waserman Law strongly encourages
Investigation timeline missing Flag HIGH risk; 3-month response timeline is mandatory
Anti-retaliation clause too generic Flag; must enumerate specific prohibited acts
GDPR compliance of alert system not addressed Flag; add DPIA reference and data-retention limits
  • [[import-politique-confidentialite-fr]]
  • [[import-politique-cookies-fr]]
  • [[import-gdpr-privacy-notice-eu]]
  • [[kb-employment-law-fr]]
  • [[import-notification-licenciement]]