draft-mediation-agreement
Rating is derived from the repo's GitHub stars and shown for reference.
name: draft-mediation-agreement
description: Use when drafting either a mediation agreement (submitting a dispute to mediation) or a settlement agreement (documenting terms reached after mediation or negotiation). Covers MENA and international institutional frameworks (DIAC, DIFC, ADGM, JAMS, CEDR, ICC ADR), confidentiality, without-prejudice protection, cost allocation, and the Singapore Convention on cross-border settlement enforcement. Triggers on "mediation agreement", "settlement agreement", "adr", "mediate", or "settle dispute" requests.
license: MIT
metadata:
id: draft.mediation-agreement
category: draft
practice_area: litigation
jurisdictions: [UAE, DIFC, ADGM, KSA, LB, EG, GCC, UK, EU, US]
priority: P1
intent: [draft, adr, mediation, settlement agreement, dispute resolution]
related: [draft-notice-of-arbitration, draft-litigation-complaint, review-dispute-resolution-clause, draft-boilerplate-clauses]
source: Louis — HAQQ Legal AI (github.com/sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal)
version: "1.0"
Mediation Agreement / Settlement Agreement
When to use this
This skill covers two related but distinct documents:
-
Mediation Agreement — signed before mediation begins; submits the dispute to a mediator; establishes the procedural framework (institution, rules, confidentiality, costs, timeline)
-
Settlement Agreement — signed after mediation (or direct negotiation) succeeds; documents the agreed settlement terms; is a binding contract replacing or supplementing the original dispute
Both documents are commonly used together: the mediation agreement governs the process; the settlement agreement records the outcome.
Part I — Mediation Agreement
When to draft this
Draft a mediation agreement when:
- Two parties wish to attempt mediated resolution before or instead of litigation/arbitration
- A contract requires mediation as a pre-condition to arbitration or litigation
- A court has ordered or recommended mediation
Required inputs
| Input | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Parties | Full identification of all disputing parties |
| Dispute description | Brief neutral description of the dispute subject |
| Mediator identity or institution | Named mediator or institutional rules to govern selection |
| Confidentiality scope | What is covered; whether even the existence of the mediation is confidential |
| Timeline | Maximum duration of the mediation process |
| Cost allocation | How mediator fees and party costs are shared |
| Governing law | Applicable to the mediation agreement itself |
Structure of the mediation agreement
-
Recitals — Identify the parties and the dispute (brief description without prejudicing positions); state the mutual desire to attempt mediation before other proceedings
-
Mediator selection and appointment
- Named individual mediator: name, credentials, contact
- Institutional process: which institution's rules govern appointment (DIAC, DIFC Centre for Amicable Dispute Resolution, ADGM IDRC, JAMS, CEDR, ICC ADR, Singapore Mediation Centre)
- Backup: if named mediator is unavailable or unacceptable, fallback appointment mechanism
-
Rules governing the mediation
- Institutional rules (by reference) or agreed bespoke rules
- Language of mediation
- Seat / location of mediation sessions (or virtual)
- Each party's right to be represented by counsel
-
Confidentiality
- Absolute confidentiality: everything said, disclosed, produced, or communicated in the mediation is confidential; no party may introduce mediation communications as evidence in any subsequent proceeding
- Scope: covers the mediator, parties, counsel, any experts or observers
- Exceptions: a) court order requiring disclosure; b) with all parties' written consent
- Consider: whether even the existence of the mediation and its outcome (if settlement not reached) are confidential
-
Without-prejudice nature
- All statements, proposals, and offers made during mediation are without prejudice to the parties' legal rights and positions
- Not admissible in any court or arbitral proceeding
-
Timeline
- Mediation to commence within X days of signing
- Sessions: typically 1-3 days; right to extend by agreement
- If no settlement within X weeks, mediation concluded (parties free to proceed to arbitration/litigation)
-
Costs
- Mediator's fees: split equally (most common) or otherwise
- Institutional administration fees: split equally
- Each party bears its own legal costs
- Deposit and payment mechanics
-
No binding settlement unless in writing
- Mediation produces no binding obligation unless and until the parties sign a written settlement agreement
- Mediator's proposals are non-binding suggestions, not arbitral awards
-
Carve-out for protective measures
- Either party may seek interim or emergency relief from a court or arbitral tribunal without prejudicing the mediation
- Such proceedings do not constitute a breach of the mediation agreement
-
Governing law and jurisdiction
- Law applicable to the mediation agreement itself
- Jurisdiction for any disputes about the mediation agreement (not the underlying dispute)
Institutional frameworks in MENA
| Institution | Notes |
|---|---|
| DIAC (Dubai International Arbitration Centre) | Has mediation rules since 2022; can appoint mediators; also handles hybrid med-arb |
| DIFC Centre for Amicable Dispute Resolution | Operates within DIFC Courts structure; can convert settlement agreement into court order |
| ADGM IDRC (International Dispute Resolution Centre) | Mediation services; connected to ADGM Courts |
| SCCA (Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration) | Provides mediation services; KSA parties often prefer local institution |
| JAMS | US-focused but operates internationally; widely used for cross-border disputes with US parties |
| CEDR (Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution) | UK-headquartered; widely respected internationally; sophisticated mediator panel |
| ICC ADR | International Chamber of Commerce ADR rules; global reach; preferred for complex international disputes |
Part II — Settlement Agreement
When to draft this
Draft a settlement agreement when the parties have reached agreement — whether through mediation, direct negotiation, or during litigation — and wish to document, formalize, and make enforceable their agreed resolution.
Required inputs
| Input | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Parties | Full legal identification of all parties |
| Background and dispute | Neutral description; brief recitals of the dispute context |
| Settlement terms | Specific obligations — payment, conduct, asset transfer, etc. |
| Release scope | Who releases whom; what is released; what is excluded |
| Confidentiality requirements | Ongoing confidentiality obligations |
| Tax allocation | Who bears any tax consequences of the settlement |
| Governing law and enforcement mechanism | How is the settlement enforced if a party defaults |
Structure of the settlement agreement
-
Recitals
- Background: the parties, their commercial relationship, the genesis of the dispute
- Dispute summary: what the dispute is about (without admitting fault)
- Mutual desire to resolve: the parties wish to settle "to avoid the uncertainty and expense of further proceedings"
-
Payment terms and non-monetary obligations
- Monetary settlement: amount, currency, payment schedule, account details
- Non-monetary: transfer of assets, provision of services, referral of business, correction of records, public statement
- Mechanics: exact payment dates; what triggers each obligation
- Late payment: interest on late payments; right to re-open dispute if payment default persists beyond X days
-
Release and discharge
- Full and final mutual release: each party releases the other from all claims, known and unknown, arising from the dispute description
- Be precise about scope: is it limited to the specific dispute? Does it extend to all claims between the parties up to the date of the agreement?
- Unknown claims release: in most jurisdictions, a general release covers unknown claims — state this expressly; California requires specific language for unknown claims (Civil Code § 1542 waiver)
- Carve-outs: obligations under the settlement agreement itself are not released; obligations under surviving contracts not in dispute are not released
- Limitations on release in KSA: Sharia-based settlements (sulh) are recognized; but releases purporting to waive Sharia rights may be challenged — verify with local counsel
-
Confidentiality
- Both parties agree to keep the existence and terms of the settlement confidential
- Exceptions: required disclosure to tax authorities, auditors, legal counsel, courts; disclosure required by law or regulation
- Non-disparagement: neither party makes disparaging public statements about the other in connection with the settled dispute
-
Dismissal of proceedings
- If litigation or arbitration is pending: parties agree to file for dismissal with prejudice (or equivalent) within X days of receiving the settlement payment
- If DIFC Courts: consent order; if arbitration: consent award or withdrawal notice
-
Tax allocation
- Specify how the settlement payment is to be treated for tax purposes (particularly relevant if the payment has an income, VAT, or withholding tax dimension)
- Parties acknowledge they have obtained their own tax advice
- Gross-up clause: if withholding tax is applicable, does the paying party gross up?
-
Breach and remedies
- If either party fails to comply with settlement terms: the other party may re-open the underlying dispute and use the settlement agreement as evidence of the other's default
- Alternatively: specific penalty for non-compliance (pre-agreed amount); applicable in civil-law jurisdictions
-
Confidentiality of underlying proceedings (if applicable)
- If mediation was used, reference back to the mediation agreement's confidentiality provisions
- Confirm that no mediation communications are admissible in any future proceedings
-
Governing law and enforcement
- Law applicable to the settlement agreement
- Forum for disputes about the settlement agreement
-
Singapore Convention on International Settlement Agreements (2019)
The United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (Singapore Convention) allows cross-border enforcement of settlement agreements reached through mediation — analogous to how the New York Convention works for arbitral awards.- Applies where parties are from different contracting states
- Signatory MENA states as of 2025: Saudi Arabia (signatory but check ratification status), UAE (signatory but check ratification status); LB not a signatory
- To qualify: the agreement must have been reached through mediation; must state this expressly; mediator must have signed or institution must be identified
- Include: express reference to mediation process; statement that it resulted from mediation; mediator's acknowledgment (or institutional certificate) if Singapore Convention enforcement is desired
Common mistakes
- Not stating "without prejudice" expressly in the mediation agreement — mediation communications may be disclosed in subsequent proceedings
- Settling individual claims but not the underlying contract relationship (parties resume dealing and re-create the same dispute)
- Inadequate definition of release scope — one party discovers an unknown claim later and argues it was not released
- Omitting the carve-out for protective proceedings during mediation — a party seeking an urgent injunction from a court while mediation is pending should not breach the mediation agreement
- Settlement agreement not converting to a consent order / consent award — paper settlement; not directly enforceable without re-litigating the settlement breach
Related skills
- [[draft-notice-of-arbitration]]
- [[draft-litigation-complaint]]
- [[review-dispute-resolution-clause]]
- [[draft-boilerplate-clauses]]