draft-aml-policy

Category: General Risk: Unknown ★ 3.9 · Rating 3.9/5 (8) sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal MIT

Rating is derived from the repo's GitHub stars and shown for reference.


name: draft-aml-policy
description: Use when asked to draft an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) policy for a financial services or fintech business. Covers the mandatory components under FATF Recommendations and jurisdiction-specific frameworks (SAMA/KSA, UAE Federal, DFSA, ADGM/FSRA, DIFC, Lebanon BDL/SIC, EU 6AMLD, US BSA/FinCEN). P0 priority for regulated entities — incomplete AML policies are a regulatory enforcement trigger.
license: MIT
metadata:
id: draft.AML-policy
category: draft
practice_area: regulatory
jurisdictions: [KSA, UAE, DIFC, ADGM, LB, EG, EU, US, GCC]
priority: P0
intent: [aml policy, anti money laundering, KYC, MLRO, compliance, fintech]
related: [draft-compliance-manual, draft-board-resolution, review-regulatory-compliance]
source: Louis — HAQQ Legal AI (github.com/sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal)
version: "1.0"

Draft — AML / KYC Policy

When to use this

Use this skill when:

  • A regulated entity (bank, NBFI, payment service, fintech, crypto exchange, law firm, real estate agent) needs an AML/KYC policy to satisfy licensing conditions or regulatory audit.
  • An existing policy requires updating after a regulatory change (new FATF guidance, local amendment).
  • A new business line or product triggers fresh AML obligations.
  • An annual policy review is due.

This is a P0 skill. Inadequate AML policies are among the most common triggers for regulatory enforcement action in MENA, EU, and US jurisdictions.

Required inputs

Input Why it matters
Entity scope Which group entities are covered; subsidiaries require separate policies or a consolidated group policy
Regulatory jurisdiction(s) Determines the specific framework; FATF baseline + local overlay
Business model Transaction types, customer types, geographies — these drive the risk-based approach
MLRO designation Money Laundering Reporting Officer identity and reporting line
Customer segments Retail, corporate, institutional, PEPs, VASPs (virtual asset service providers)

Mandatory components

1. Policy statement

A clear commitment from the Board of Directors (or equivalent governing body) to:

  • Comply with applicable AML/CFT (Counter-Financing of Terrorism) laws.
  • Maintain a risk-based compliance program.
  • Allocate adequate resources to AML compliance.

The policy statement must be signed by the Board or senior management and dated.

2. MLRO appointment

  • Full name, title, and contact information of the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) — or equivalent role (Compliance Officer, Designated Compliance Function).
  • Reporting line: MLRO reports directly to the Board or a Board Committee; must not report through a business line that generates revenue.
  • Deputy MLRO: designate a deputy for absence/incapacity.
  • MLRO authority: can refuse a transaction, file an STR, or escalate without commercial pressure.

3. Risk-based approach (RBA)

The RBA is the foundation of the FATF framework. The policy must describe:

  • Business-wide risk assessment (BWRA): identify and assess the ML/TF risks inherent in the entity's products, services, customers, delivery channels, and geographic exposure.
  • Customer risk categorization: segment customers into Low, Medium, and High risk tiers with criteria for each.
  • Risk scoring model: document the factors used (customer type, geography, product, transaction behavior, PEP status, sanctions exposure).
  • Review cycle for the BWRA: at least annually and after any material change to business model.

4. Customer Due Diligence (CDD)

Standard CDD (all customers):

  • Verify identity using reliable, independent documentary evidence.
  • For individuals: government-issued photo ID (passport, national ID), date of birth, address.
  • For entities: certificate of incorporation, memorandum/articles, register of directors, ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) identification.
  • UBO threshold: 25% ownership or control is the FATF standard; some jurisdictions use 10% or 20% — verify local rule.
  • Understand the nature and purpose of the business relationship.
  • Obtain source of wealth for high-risk relationships.

Simplified CDD: available for demonstrably low-risk customers (listed companies on regulated exchanges, regulated financial institutions, government entities) — document the rationale.

Ongoing CDD: monitor the business relationship; update records when there is a material change; apply periodic review based on risk tier.

5. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)

EDD must be applied to:

  • Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) — current and former; domestic and foreign; including family members and close associates.
  • High-risk geographic jurisdictions — FATF grey-listed or black-listed jurisdictions; jurisdictions with known ML/TF risk (update list at least quarterly).
  • Cash-intensive businesses — money service businesses, real estate, precious metals/stones.
  • Virtual asset service providers (VASPs) — additional obligations under FATF Recommendation 15 and jurisdictional VASP regimes (VARA in UAE, ADGM FSRA).
  • High-value transactions — above a defined threshold (jurisdiction-specific; commonly ,000 / equivalent for wire transfers).
  • Complex or unusual transaction structures.

EDD measures include:

  • Additional identity verification.
  • Senior management approval for account opening.
  • Source of funds and source of wealth documentation.
  • Enhanced ongoing monitoring.

6. Ongoing transaction monitoring

  • Systems and processes to monitor customer transactions for patterns inconsistent with the customer's risk profile and stated business.
  • Threshold-based alerts: transaction amounts above defined limits trigger review.
  • Pattern-based alerts: structuring (breaking large transactions into smaller amounts to avoid reporting thresholds), unusual geographic patterns, unusually rapid movement of funds.
  • Alert review process: triage, investigation, escalation to MLRO.
  • Monitoring should be both automated (transaction monitoring system) and manual (relationship manager observation).

7. Sanctions screening

  • Screen all customers, beneficial owners, and counterparties against applicable sanctions lists.
  • Lists to screen:
    • UN Security Council Consolidated List.
    • OFAC (US Specially Designated Nationals) — required for USD transactions and US-connected entities.
    • EU Consolidated List.
    • UK HM Treasury Sanctions List.
    • Local lists (UAE CBUAE list, KSA SAFIU list, Lebanese counterterrorism list, etc.).
  • Screening frequency: at onboarding; at each transaction where feasible; daily batch screening for name-list changes.
  • Match handling: documented escalation procedure; freeze assets and report where required; seek regulatory guidance on complex matches.
  • Sanctions violations are strict liability in most jurisdictions — no mental element required.

8. Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs / STRs)

  • Filing obligation: when the MLRO has knowledge or suspicion (or reasonable grounds for suspicion) that a transaction involves proceeds of crime or ML/TF.
  • Filing authority: MLRO is the sole person authorized to file; staff report suspicions internally to MLRO.
  • Tipping-off prohibition: it is a criminal offense in most jurisdictions to disclose to the subject that a SAR has been filed.
  • Jurisdiction-specific filing:
    • UAE: goAML platform (Central Bank UAE).
    • KSA: Financial Investigation Unit (FIU), Saudi Ministry of Interior.
    • DIFC: DFSA.
    • ADGM: FSRA.
    • LB: Special Investigation Commission (SIC), Banque du Liban.
    • EU: national FIU of member state.
    • US: FinCEN via BSA e-filing.
  • Time limits: typically 30 days from becoming aware of the suspicion; faster for urgent matters.

9. Record retention

  • Standard period: 5 years from end of business relationship or transaction (FATF baseline).
  • Extended periods: some jurisdictions require 7–10 years (verify local rule).
  • What to retain: CDD documentation, transaction records, STR/SAR filings, correspondence, training records.
  • Records must be retrievable within a reasonable time for regulatory inspection.

10. Staff training

  • Annual mandatory training: all staff must complete AML/CFT training annually; records maintained.
  • Role-specific training: front-line staff (onboarding, relationship management), compliance team, senior management.
  • New hire training: AML training within first 30 days of employment.
  • Training must cover: red flags, SAR filing procedure, tipping-off prohibition, sanctions, and the firm's specific risk profile.

11. Independent audit and testing

  • Annual independent review of the AML program (internal audit or external third party).
  • Testing should cover: CDD quality, transaction monitoring effectiveness, SAR filing completeness, sanctions screening accuracy, training records.
  • Findings and management responses documented; tracked to remediation.

Jurisdictional overlay — key specifics

Jurisdiction Primary framework Key regulator Notable requirements
KSA AML Law (Royal Decree M/20 2003, amended) + SAMA Rules SAFIU; SAMA Zakat-based entities have modified requirements; designated non-financial businesses (DNFBPs) regulated
UAE Federal Federal Decree-Law 20/2018 on AML/CFT + CBUAE regulations CBUAE; goAML 60-day registration on goAML required; DNFBP register
DIFC DFSA AML Module (AMI) DFSA Periodic AML returns filed with DFSA; DFSA AML inspections
ADGM FSRA AML Rulebook FSRA Alignment with DIFC/DFSA approach but separate filing
LB Law 44/2015 (AML/CFT) + BDL circulars Special Investigation Commission (SIC) Banks: enhanced CDD on cash transactions; STRs to SIC
EU 6th AML Directive (6AMLD) + national implementation National FIU Cross-border information sharing; criminal liability for legal persons
US Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) + FinCEN rules + PATRIOT Act FinCEN; federal banking regulators CTRs for transactions >,000; CIP rules; beneficial ownership rule

Critical for fintech and virtual assets

  • VARA (UAE): Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority in Dubai — VASP license requires dedicated VASP AML policy on top of standard AML program.
  • ADGM FSRA: Virtual Asset Framework — specific CDD and ongoing monitoring for virtual asset businesses.
  • FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16): transfers of virtual assets above USD 1,000 / EUR 1,000 must be accompanied by originator and beneficiary information; the implementing jurisdiction's threshold may differ. Technology implementation (TRISA, OpenVASP, or similar) must be operational.
  • Real-time monitoring: fintech transaction monitoring must handle high velocity and 24/7 operations; static rule-based systems are often insufficient; behavioral analytics expected.

Implementation checklist

  • MLRO appointed, mandate documented, reported to regulator where required
  • Board-approved policy in place, signed, dated
  • Business-wide risk assessment completed and documented
  • CDD procedures in place with UBO identification
  • EDD procedures defined for PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, VASPs
  • Sanctions screening tool operational with at minimum UN + OFAC + local lists
  • Transaction monitoring system operational (automated alerts + manual review)
  • SAR/STR filing procedure documented; MLRO trained
  • Staff training delivered; records retained
  • Independent annual review scheduled
  • Record retention system in place for 5–7 years
  • [[draft-compliance-manual]]
  • [[draft-board-resolution]]
  • [[review-regulatory-compliance]]