docs-roi-calculator
Rating is derived from the repo's GitHub stars and shown for reference.
automation_control
name: docs-roi-calculator
description: Use when a prospective customer or sales team member asks about the financial return of deploying a legal AI assistant, or when handling a cost-based sales objection. Generates a quantified monthly savings estimate and payback period from three simple inputs — contracts reviewed per week, average review time, and billable hourly rate — mapped against Louis's time-saving benchmark. Applicable across all jurisdictions and firm sizes.
license: MIT
metadata:
id: docs.ROI-calculator
category: docs
jurisdictions: [multi]
priority: P2
intent: [roi, cost savings, sales objection, payback period, pricing justification]
related: [docs-whitepaper-general, docs-security-overview, docs-terms-of-service-summary]
source: Louis — HAQQ Legal AI (github.com/sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal)
version: "1.0"
ROI Calculator — Legal AI Time & Cost Savings
Purpose
This skill computes a concrete return-on-investment estimate for a law firm, legal department, or solo practitioner evaluating Louis. It is designed for sales conversations, procurement evaluations, and budget-justification memos — transforming abstract "AI saves time" claims into verifiable, prospect-specific numbers.
Inputs
| Input | Description | Typical Range | Default if not provided |
|---|---|---|---|
contracts_per_week |
Number of contracts or documents reviewed weekly by the target user or team | 2 – 200 | Ask the user |
avg_review_hours |
Average time (in hours) to review one contract manually, from open to close | 0.5 – 8 hrs | 2.0 hrs |
billable_rate |
Hourly billable rate (or effective cost rate for in-house teams) in USD or local currency | – /hr | /hr |
time_saving_pct |
Louis's estimated time reduction per review. Default benchmark: 40%. Can be adjusted up (80% for routine contracts) or down (20% for bespoke M&A work). | 20% – 80% | 40% |
subscription_cost |
Monthly cost of Louis subscription for the user's tier | Varies by plan | Ask or use published pricing |
Calculation logic
hours_saved_per_week = contracts_per_week × avg_review_hours × time_saving_pct
hours_saved_per_month = hours_saved_per_week × 4.33
monthly_value_saved = hours_saved_per_month × billable_rate
payback_months = subscription_cost ÷ monthly_value_saved (if < 1, express as days)
annual_roi_pct = ((monthly_value_saved × 12) - (subscription_cost × 12))
÷ (subscription_cost × 12) × 100
Output format
Present results in a clean summary block:
─────────────────────────────────────
Louis ROI Estimate — [Firm/User Name]
─────────────────────────────────────
Weekly contracts reviewed: [X]
Avg. review time: [X hrs]
Billable / cost rate: [$ / hr]
Time saved per review (40%): [X hrs]
Hours saved / month: [X hrs]
Monthly value of time saved: $[X]
Monthly subscription cost: $[X]
Net monthly benefit: $[X]
Payback period: [X weeks / days]
12-month ROI: [X %]
─────────────────────────────────────
Follow the table with a one-paragraph narrative for copy-paste into a business case email.
Worked example
Inputs: 20 contracts/week · 2 hrs avg · /hr · 40% saving · /mo subscription.
- Hours saved/month: 20 × 2 × 0.40 × 4.33 = 69.3 hrs
- Monthly value: 69.3 × = ,255
- Net benefit: ,255 − = ,755/mo
- Payback: 0.6 days
- 12-month ROI: 4,651%
Sensitivities to mention
- High-volume, routine contracts (NDAs, employment offers, standard service agreements): time-saving is often 60–80%. The default 40% is conservative.
- Complex bespoke deals (M&A, project finance, ISDA): saving is 20–30% and value comes from completeness and consistency, not raw speed.
- In-house teams (GC/legal ops): use fully-loaded cost per hour (salary + benefits + overhead ÷ 2,080) rather than billable rate.
- Currency: quote in the prospect's local currency (AED, SAR, LBP, EGP, EUR, GBP) for MENA markets.
Caveats
- These are illustrative estimates, not guarantees. Actual savings depend on task mix, user adoption, document complexity, and integration depth.
- Time savings do not automatically translate to billable revenue for law firms unless the freed capacity is re-billed; frame as "capacity freed for higher-value work" in firm contexts.
- For in-house teams, anchor to headcount avoidance or contract cycle-time reduction as a secondary metric.
Related skills
- [[docs-whitepaper-general]]
- [[docs-security-overview]]
- [[docs-terms-of-service-summary]]
- [[docs-word-plugin-setup]]