figma-design-qa

Category: Design Risk: Low risk ★ 4.6 · Rating 4.6/5 (1014) mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills MIT

Rating is derived from the repo's GitHub stars and shown for reference.

automation_control

name: figma-design-qa
description: "Runs a pre-handoff QA checklist on a Figma design before it goes to engineering. Use when asked to QA a Figma design, do a pre-handoff check, or validate a Figma file is ready to build. Produces a structured QA report covering file hygiene, component usage, accessibility, and handoff readiness with explicit pass/fail status per item. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models."

Figma Design QA Skill

Runs a systematic pre-handoff QA check on a Figma design — catching issues that cause engineering back-and-forth before they become expensive.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Feature or screen being QA-d (describe what has been designed)
  • Platform (iOS / Android / Web)
  • Design system (custom / Material / HIG / None)
  • Handoff tool (Figma Inspect / Zeplin / Storybook / Direct link)
  • QA depth (quick 15 min / standard 30 min / thorough 60 min)

Output Structure

QA Report: [Feature] | [Date] | [Platform]
Overall status: Ready / Minor fixes needed / Not ready

Section 1: File Hygiene

  • All layers named semantically (no "Rectangle 12")
  • No unused/hidden layers in final frames
  • Components from library (not detached copies)
  • All text uses text styles (not manual font settings)
  • All colours use styles or variables (not hex overrides)
  • Frames named to match screen map
  • No leftover prototype wires to wrong frames

Section 2: Component Usage

  • All buttons use library component
  • All inputs use library component
  • All icons from approved icon library
  • No custom components that should be in library
  • Variants used correctly (right size, state, type)

Section 3: Content and Copy

  • No placeholder text (Lorem ipsum) in final designs
  • All copy reviewed and approved
  • Realistic content used (not "User Name")
  • Long text edge cases tested
  • Error messages are human-readable
  • Empty states have copy and CTA

Section 4: States and Coverage

  • Default, Loading, Empty, Error, Success states
  • Interactive elements have hover/active (web)
  • Disabled states designed where applicable

Section 5: Accessibility

  • All text meets WCAG AA contrast (4.5:1 body, 3:1 large)
  • UI components meet 3:1 contrast against background
  • Touch targets minimum 44x44pt iOS / 48x48dp Android
  • Focus states for keyboard/switch navigation (web)
  • Information not conveyed by colour alone
  • Icons have text labels or accessible names annotated

Section 6: Handoff Readiness

  • Dev annotations on non-obvious interactions
  • Spacing uses Auto Layout (not absolute positioning)
  • Images/assets exported at correct resolutions
  • Design matches approved requirements
  • Link to prototype included

Issues Found

For each fail:
[Issue] — Blocking / Fix before handoff / Fix in next iteration

  • What: [Specific layer/screen/element]
  • Fix: [Exact action needed]
  • Owner: [Designer/PM/Both]

Handoff Decision

Status, signed off by, date.

Quality Checks

  • All 6 sections completed
  • Every fail has a specific description and fix action
  • Blocking issues separated from minor ones
  • Handoff decision is explicit

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not produce a partial QA — every checklist category must be evaluated, not just the ones that are obviously problematic
  • Do not leave the handoff decision ambiguous — the output must explicitly state pass, pass with conditions, or fail
  • Do not skip accessibility checks — colour contrast, tap target size, and screen reader labels are required, not optional
  • Do not report issues without specifying which screen or component they appear on
  • Do not approve a design if any component is detached from the library without a documented reason

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "QA this Figma design before handoff"
  • "Run a pre-handoff check on [feature] design"
  • "Is this Figma design ready for engineering?"
  • "Do a design QA on [screen/feature]"
  • "What needs fixing before we hand this off?"