lesson-plan

Category: Design Risk: Unknown ★ 4.6 · Rating 4.6/5 (1014) mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills MIT

Rating is derived from the repo's GitHub stars and shown for reference.


name: lesson-plan
description: "Build a complete, standards-aligned lesson plan with clear objectives, a timed activity sequence, differentiation, and assessment. Use when asked to write a lesson plan, plan a class or lesson, design a teaching session, or structure instruction for a topic. Produces a ready-to-teach plan with measurable objectives, a minute-by-minute flow, materials, checks for understanding, and differentiation for varied learners."

Lesson Plan Skill

A great lesson plan makes the goal measurable, the time accountable, and learning visible. This skill produces one a teacher can walk into class and run — with built-in differentiation and checks for understanding.

Working from a brief

Given a topic and grade level, produce the full plan anyway — infer reasonable objectives and standards and mark them (adapt to your standards). Never leave "[insert activity]"; supply concrete, age-appropriate activities.

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not already provided):

  • Topic / subject and grade or age level
  • Lesson length (e.g. 45 min) and format (in-person, remote, hybrid)
  • Standards / curriculum to align to (optional — note if to be adapted)
  • Class context (size, range of abilities, language needs)

Output Format

Lesson overview

  • Topic · Grade · Duration
  • Standards alignment: [framework + codes, or "adapt to your standards"]

Learning objectives

2–4 objectives in measurable, student-facing form: "By the end, students will be able to [observable verb]…" (use Bloom's-level verbs; avoid "understand/know").

Materials & prep

Bulleted list of what's needed and any setup.

Lesson flow (timed)

Time Phase What happens
0–5 Hook / warm-up Engage and surface prior knowledge
5–15 Direct instruction Teach the core idea
15–30 Guided / group practice Students apply with support
30–40 Independent practice Students work solo
40–45 Close / exit ticket Consolidate + check understanding

(Adjust the splits to the real duration.)

Checks for understanding

2–3 quick formative checks woven through (cold call, thumbs, mini-whiteboard, exit ticket question).

Differentiation

  • Support (struggling / ELL / IEP): scaffolds, sentence frames, visual aids
  • Extension (advanced): a stretch task or deeper question

Assessment

How you'll know the objective was met (the exit ticket question or task), with success criteria.

Homework / follow-up (optional)

A short, purposeful task that reinforces the objective.

Quality Checks

  • Objectives are measurable and student-facing (observable verbs, not "understand")
  • The timed flow sums to the lesson length
  • Includes at least two checks for understanding
  • Differentiation covers both support and extension
  • Assessment maps directly back to the objectives

Anti-Patterns

  • Objectives that can't be observed or measured ("students will appreciate…")
  • A flow that's all teacher talk with no student practice
  • No formative checks until a final test
  • One-size-fits-all with no differentiation